Matric Results and Privacy: The Appeal Moves Forward |
The Supreme Court of Appeal will hear a challenge over publishing results by examination number, with learners’ privacy and public access at the centre of the dispute. |

Finding an examination number in a results listing is a familiar part of finishing matric. Whether publishing results this way sufficiently protects a learner’s identity remains a question for the courts.
The Information Regulator has obtained permission to appeal a ruling allowing matric results to be published using examination numbers instead of names. AfriForum, a party to the case, confirmed the development on 18 September 2026.
The decision allows the appeal to proceed. It does not settle whether this publication method complies with privacy law. Why an examination number matters
The dispute centres on the Protection of Personal Information Act, or POPIA, and whether results linked to examination numbers remain personal information.
The regulator argues that replacing names with numbers does not remove the privacy concerns. Supporters of publication argue that examination numbers protect learners’ identities while keeping results publicly accessible.
The distinction matters beyond the appearance of a results page: removing a name and making someone unidentifiable are not necessarily the same thing. The litigation tests how that applies to matric results.
How the appeal reached this stage
In December 2025, a full bench of the Pretoria High Court ruled in favour of publication using examination numbers and set aside the regulator’s enforcement and infringement notices.
The regulator challenged that judgment, saying the courts should clarify organisations’ responsibilities to protect personal information and comply with its orders.
The High Court refused leave to appeal on 3 June 2026. The regulator then approached the Supreme Court of Appeal directly and obtained permission to continue its challenge.
AfriForum argues that the case also has implications for other information published using codes or numbers. That is its position in the dispute; the appeal court must still determine the issues before it. What families can do
The case concerns how results are made public. It does not concern how learners’ answers are marked or whether they have passed. For learners and parents, the useful steps are straightforward:
The department’s guidance identifies schools and examination centres as collection points and advises candidates to enquire if their results are missing online.
The Bottom Line
Learners need access to their results and proper protection of their personal information. While the appeal considers how public listings should work, families can prepare by keeping their school’s results-collection instructions and contact details handy. |
More from Joburg Insider

Nov 6, 2026
Answers Sought on Mayibuye Roadworks
Community leader raises congestion and emergency-access concerns over Sinamurula Street works.

Nov 5, 2026
A Longer-Term Plan for Lonehill Dam
Residents and specialists are exploring how better monitoring and sludge management could support the recovery of a northern Johannesburg landmark.

Nov 5, 2026
Put Bromhof’s Tin Road Market in Your Diary
The Tin Road Craft & Farmer’s Market offers food, local crafts and a family outing at Syringa Café this November.

Nov 5, 2026
Ballet Training Steps Into the Spotlight
The Russian School of Ballet’s Vaganova Showcase will take audiences inside the training process, from a dancer’s first formal exercises to advanced preparation.

0 Comments
Join the conversation
Be the first to comment
Share your thoughts above.